Zeitgeist

Why am I in zag when the ruling party is in zig?

 

“In a democracy dissent is an act of faith. Like medicine, the test of its value is not its taste but its effects, not how it makes people feel at the moment, but how it inspires them to act thereafter. Criticism may embarrass the country’s leaders in the short run but strengthen their hand in the long run; it may destroy a consensus on policy while expressing a consensus of values. Woodrow Wilson once said that there was “such a thing as being too proud to fight;” there is also, or ought to be, such a thing as being too confident to conform, too strong to be silent in the face of apparent error. Criticism, in short, is more than a right; it is an act of patriotism, a higher form of patriotism, I believe, than the familiar rituals of national adulation.” ~ J. William Fulbright, American politician and U.S. Senator (1905-1995)

Today, I had an interesting conversation with a friend who asked me how I could support the current party in power in Maharashtra when it was forming the government, while still protesting about the government-thus-formed’s bad decisions, perceived paralysis & inaction, obvious inexperience, and definite heavy-handedness. He asked me point blank, and a little innocently, if I see myself as a professional complainer.


He has a point, you see.


When the INC was in power, I was vehemently and consistently bringing up their corruption, their lethargy and glacial speed of movement, their fantastical notions of socialism or even secularism, their constant naming of everything after one family, their sycophancy, their nepotism, their policy paralysis, their dynastic succession, and so on.


And when the BJP swept everything before it, I was opposed to their dishonest intent, their communalism, their anti/pseudo-science, their fake history-mythology mixup, their obscurantism, their xenophobia, their corruption, their quick but stupid decisions, their pandering to the basest instincts, their disenfranchisement of huge swathes of citizens, their lack of empathy, their obsession with optics, their inferiority complex, and so on.


In the future, when the INC comes back in power (don’t be shocked…I am not making a snarky point…merely stating the obvious…nothing lasts), you will find me holding them to account, challenging every decision of theirs, comparing them unfavourably with their predecessors, and viewing them with cynicism, even mocking them.

Why do or will I never speak of the successes of those in power? Of all the good they do (and surely, even the most evil, the most corrupt, the most inefficient, bumbling idiot does something right once in a while, even by accident)? Why do I remember them only when their party is out of power, and only as something to hammer the incumbents with? Am I a sad soul? Do I live a tragic life? Does nobody love me?

If this is what you are asking, I am afraid you haven’t understood me at all. I am not a professional dissenter or pessimist. I am simply following the duty as a citizen in a free democracy: My default setting is “Opposition”. My default lens of looking at anyone in power is “Distrust”. My default view is “Scepticism.”


And that’s actually very healthy for the relationship between my government and me. Trust me.


Why is that? Many in my circle may be surprised if they hear that the Constitution of a democratic republic (not just India, ANY democratic republic), the legislature and the courts of such a nation, and of course, the media, are all meant to protect the citizen from the government in power. The only arm of the government that is meant to serve and not oppose them is the executive. But it is neither surprising nor a novel way of looking at the relationship between you and your government. It is obvious. For those who care to look.

I would invite my friends here to read up, think, debate, and come to their own conclusion as to why a democracy is structured the way it is, and why it is indeed dangerous to be pro-government at any time, regardless of the government of the day.


Try it. You have nothing to lose but your (psychological) chains.
Did you like what you read? Share it with friends.

You may also like

Nostalgia

Cool af!

Finding solo photos of myself from back in the days is a task. ...

Satire

Advising Rahul.

Everyone, their uncle, and their dog seems to understand politics better than Rahul ...

1 Comment

  1. Loved reading this Kedar.
    Couldn't agree more.
    Keep writing.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Zeitgeist