Commentary

Hindu apologists are becoming repetitive.

The more I debate with Hindu apologists, the more predictable their assertions become.


Most start with the ‘No True Scotsman’ argument, and end with the ’Not in my Philosophy’ gambit, also called the ‘Courtier’s Reply’ and redefining god as vaguely as possible as to elicit no discussion thereafter.

I can spot a pattern in less than a couple of minutes nowadays. It leads me to conclude that either they are getting lazier, or I am getting jaded. Or both.
Did you like what you read? Share it with friends.

You may also like

Commentary

Akashvani…

I ask how a song supposedly suppressed by Congress became something generations of ...
Commentary

Patriotism.

I ask what patriotism means when nationalism demands that lawyers, doctors, scholars, and ...

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More in Commentary