Zeitgeist

Hindu apologists are becoming repetitive.

Kedar Anil Gadgil5 February 2014

The more I debate with Hindu apologists, the more predictable their assertions become.

Most start with the ‘No True Scotsman’ argument, and end with the ’Not in my Philosophy’ gambit, also called the ‘Courtier’s Reply’ and redefining god as vaguely as possible as to elicit no discussion thereafter.

I can spot a pattern in less than a couple of minutes nowadays. It leads me to conclude that either they are getting lazier, or I am getting jaded. Or both.

Did you like what you read? Share it with friends.

Leave a reply Cancel reply

More in Zeitgeist

Warning

Snakes. And solidarity.

Privilege

The Gatekeepers of the Future.

Debate

Honest questions.

Debate

Fallacy as alibi.