P.P.S: Apparently, some well-wishers enquired if this means that ‘…by that standard, nobody should criticize the wrongdoings of those in power too?’ I get where they are coming from. So, let me answer that here:
I did not say that. I am speaking of the personal failing of people. For example, let us take a hypothetical case of Sachin Tendulkar’s hidden wealth abroad. To be fair, we have elected and appointed representatives to look into it. And if anyone, it is them we should take to task, while of course, calling out Tendulkar, and ensuring that those that we have appointed to uphold the law do their job of investigating, prosecuting, and punishing the guilty. But let us also accept that given half a chance, at least 99,999 out of 100,000 of us, if not more, would have stolen taxes.
How do I know that? Because I have seen those 99,999 stealing a few tens of thousands or lakhs. So, I have no reason to believe that if the opportunity and resources were present, these ten-thousand-or-lakhs-of-rupee-tax-evaders would do the very same with crores. The point is, we should be less moralising about his money.
This does not apply, of course, to public authority or public finances. I thought this was obvious. Nor do I mean they should not be brought to justice and made to face the consequences of their actions. All I am saying is that we should stop bloody moralising about it.
By the way, who is the 100,000th person in that list where 99,999 will grab the opportunity to use unfair means to get ahead if only they could? That’d be you, dear reader. You, as you know, are the epitome of morality, righteousness, and saintly behaviour. You are the 100,000th person. Each one of you readers. Clearly, this diatribe does not refer to your actions, or even thoughts. You have never uttered the wrong word, or conducted yourself badly. Ever. Nor will you in the future. Ever. Right? Right.